4 Mar
The Downside of Holding Physical Gold
Posted in Playful Dance by Roger, the Amateur Financier 8 CommentsIn the spirit of the ‘Playful Dance‘, that is, responding to other bloggers’ posts in my own posts, I’m going to start what I hope is a long-running series where I write a response to something another author has put up. Sometimes I’ll agree, more often I’ll disagree (it gets pretty boring if everyone is saying the same things all the time), and most of the time I’ll simply try to find an alternative view on what is being said. Enjoy it, and be sure to check out the article I’m responding to, as well; there’s plenty of great personal finance writing out there, just waiting to be found.
When going back over some of the posts published last week to find what I should include in my latest round up, I came across Holding Physical Gold is About Safety, Not Speculation from 20s Money. He advocates holding gold (actual, physical gold, stored at home) as a way to be more secure.
I have to disagree. While gold can be add diversification to your portfolio (I said as much way back when I covered gold for my Investing 101 series), I think that some of the reasons provided could be misinterpreted. Here’s my take on a few of the claims made:
Claim One: ‘The reality is that gold [and silver] will have value today, and hundreds of years from now.’
Yes, and no. True, there are uses for gold beyond serving as a store of money. However, the major use for good in current society is to look pretty and serve as a store of wealth. If something happens that would lead to a great deal of new gold being produced (say, a massive new gold mine or the discovery of alchemy-like process that can generate a great deal of gold), the price could very easily drop far below the current levels, leaving you holding gold worth much less than you actually paid. If gold prices behave as they have in the past, after the last big run up in price, they’ll actually start falling once things return to normal (as they have for most of the past quarter century).
Claim Two: ‘If the dollar continues to weaken, which has been the trend, we will be not hurt as badly if we own gold [and silver].’
This is a trickier one. Yes, holding assets that aren’t denominated in dollars and which tend to hold value even as the dollar declines is one way to hedge against a falling dollar. However, holding physical gold is far from the only, or even the best way, to do so. Holding foreign stocks, bonds, or even foreign currency provides a more ready way to hedge against falling dollar prices; when a stronger foreign currency is converted into a weaker one, you’ll end up getting more bang for your buck (or rather, more bucks for your Euro, pound, yen, ruble, etc.). The transaction costs will be less than buying and selling physical gold, and if you’re holding foreign stocks or bonds in a mutual fund, the disbursements will be automatically converted to dollars before being sent to you.
Claim Three: ‘What does concern me is that I am more secure by having some holdings of physical gold [and silver].’
This one, I suppose, depends on your definition of security. Holding a sizable amount of physical gold in your own house will save you from paying the costs for a safe deposit box or other source of gold storage, but there are downsides, as well. You need to worry that your gold could get lost or stolen, that the gold is, in fact, gold (as well as the same quality and quantity you originally paid for) and whether the transaction costs of buying and selling the gold will destroy the actual value of the gold itself. With all those problems, it seems hard to justify the ownership of gold, at least, physical, you need to find a place to store it and protect it, gold.
My Conclusion
In spite of all of this, I have no real problem with gold investing. All I ask is that you consider exactly why you’re doing so, look at some of the alternatives (both alternative ways to invest in gold, rather than holding gold bullion at home, and alternatives to gold investing itself), and do what makes the most financial sense for your situation. If that means having some gold at home in a safe place because it helps you sleep at night, go right ahead. Just know the real price of that insurance, in terms of dollars, investment risk, and storage costs.
(Before I forget, Kevin wrote a post that referenced my blog, the The Allure of Alexa, which inspired me to read his blog and write this post in response to one of his other posts. So, um, this is a sort of thank you where I nitpick your argument the whole time. You’re…welcome? It was really all in good fun and the attempt to spread the word, my friend.)
What do you think about gold investing? Did I miss any major pros that more than justify the cons listed here? Did I completely misunderstand Kevin’s point and reasoning behind his gold investments?






Monevator
on March 6 2010
Well put – physical gold has a cost, which is either the cost of a safety deposit box at your bank, or the un-costed risk of it being robbed!
.-= Monevator´s last blog ..Volatility, inflation, and asset class returns =-.
China: Home of the world's bargain bankers
on March 6 2010
[...] The downside of holding physical gold – The Amateur Financier [...]
LeanLifeCoach
on March 6 2010
There are some people I know that cannot promote gold enough. They are hoarding in preparation for the collapse of society. But when the earthquake in Haiti happened I didn’t see any stories of a booming gold market.
Honestly though, I would probably buy some gold, just not at these crazy prices.
.-= LeanLifeCoach´s last blog ..Combating the Closing Techniques – The Assumptive Close =-.
Financial Samurai
on March 7 2010
And gold is pretty damn heavy to carry!
Hope 20smoney stops by and contributes to the discussion!
.-= Financial Samurai´s last blog ..Sometimes Saving Money Is About Principle =-.
The Rat
on March 7 2010
Purchasing physical gold interests me; it would be nice to see prices depreciate so that it becomes more attractive to buy.
.-= The Rat´s last blog ..BIN Revisited: From Tantrum to Tantalization =-.
David @ MBA briefs
on March 7 2010
I think gold investments are a good way of diversifying your portfolio, but not a sure-fire way of getting rich. The one thing in gold’s favor is the supply is finite (as far as we know) and there’s no version of cubic zirconia for gold.
.-= David @ MBA briefs´s last blog ..Not-so-bad news is the new good news =-.
Yakezie Alexa Challenge Carnival | The Life of an Insurance Salesman
on March 8 2010
[...] The Downside of Holding Physical Gold from The Amateur Financier [...]
Roger
on March 8 2010
@Monevator: Yes, too often people overlook the full costs of their investments (gold and otherwise); in terms of gold, this means that they often ignore things like the chance that they could get robbed and lose their investment (unless they make sure that their homeowner’s or renter’s insurance will cover their gold, although if they have a substantial amount of it at home, they might end up paying more for the coverage anyway).
@LeanLifeCoach: True, when you hear about a tragedy, you almost never hear about the local populace abandoning their national currency and trading gold for goods and services. It does sort of shoot holes in the ‘gold is a natural currency and will easily replace our fiat system following a national emergency’ argument.
@FS: Very true; in case of an emergency like a fire where I needed to flee my home quickly, I’d much rather grab a small fire safe containing all my important documents than try to lug around several pounds of gold (which may get lost or ‘misplaced’ during the ensuing panic). As for 20smoney, he did send me a small email saying that I raised some good points; I don’t know whether he’ll make a comment on this post himself, although I would like that.
@The Rat: As long as you know what you’re getting into, purchasing physical gold can be one way to diversify. Just have a plan and you’ll do alright.
@David: Good points; gold can provide diversification (although if that’s all you’re after, there are simpler ways than holding several pounds of gold bullion). True, gold’s supply is finite (at least, the easily accessible amount here on Earth is limited, although not exhausted yet), and there are no direct alternatives (although, depending on the application, things like silver, platinum, and even ‘lower’ metals like copper can do the same industrial applications (almost) as good, in most cases), but let’s remember, the reason it’s selling for over $1000 an ounce now is less because of its innate properties or industrial usefulness and more because people still associate it with money, even in our days of a fiat currency. If we sold it at a price reflecting its actual worth in industry, it would be selling for a price much closer to silver, around $10-20 an ounce at most.